Bitcoin's Big Brother Scythe, a Nasdaq Heist Chronicle
Original Title: The Nakamoto Heist: How David Bailey Used a 99% Stock Collapse to Buy His Own Empire
Original Author: Justin Bechler, Bitcoin OG
Original Translation: Ismay, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: This article delves into the intricate capital operation behind David Bailey and his controlled Nakamoto Holdings ($NAKA). From the frenzied surge during the backdoor listing to a staggering 99% collapse after retail investors entered, and finally to using a listed company with nothing but liabilities to acquire his own private assets at a hefty premium, this was a meticulously crafted wealth transfer leveraging information asymmetry and regulatory loopholes.
It is a harsh investigation into greed, regulatory arbitrage, and influencer capitalism. It warns us that when belief is packaged as a financial product and when the slogan of decentralization meets centralized greed, retail investors often end up as the final liquidity exit. Understanding this story may give you more sobriety and less blind obedience the next time a big shot makes a call.
Below is the full article content:
This morning, David Bailey utilized a publicly traded company whose market value had evaporated by 99% to acquire his own two privately held companies at a 4x premium to the current stock price — all without the need for shareholder approval.
What's most astonishing? The asset transfer spectacle was already locked in well before retail investors bought their first share.
To understand how this was achieved, we must start from the beginning.
In May 2025, a zombie company named KindlyMD announced a merger with David Bailey's Bitcoin reserve tool Nakamoto Holdings.
The stock price skyrocketed from $2 to over $30 within a few days, and retail investors rushed in. Bitcoin influencers celebrated, with Bailey even likening himself to the Morgan, Medici, and Rothschild families.

Nine months later, the stock price had plummeted to 29 cents, and Bailey had just used this very stock to acquire his companies.
The Pump
Its mechanism is quite ingenious.
KindlyMD was originally a Nasdaq microcap stock that no one paid attention to. Nakamoto Holdings went public through a reverse merger, backed by a $510 million PIPE (Private Investment in Public Equity) financing and $200 million in convertible bond support.
On paper, this seemed to be the birth of a Bitcoin reserve giant, with the new generation of Bitcoin influencers eagerly telling you why you should buy $NAKA (of course, the reason being to own more Bitcoin).
Within days, NAKA's Price-to-NAV ratio reached an astonishing 23x, meaning speculators were willing to pay $23 for every $1 of Bitcoin the company held.
Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy never reached such a premium. The difference is that MicroStrategy has years of operating history, a software business generating actual revenue, and a CEO who did not manipulate the trading structure to line his pockets on the backend.

Insiders know secrets that retail investors don't. PIPE investors — including the notorious BIP-110 opponent Udi Wertheimer, Jameson Lopp, and Adam Back — got their chips at a price of $1.12 per share. Retail investors bought in at $28, $30, $31, or even higher.
This information asymmetry was ingrained in the architecture from day one.
In June, Bailey completed another $51.5 million PIPE financing at $5.00 per share. While the second batch of investors entered at a cost far below that of retail investors, it was still well above the $1.12 floor price, and they too were eventually harvested.
Bailey celebrated the financing completion, stating it took less than 72 hours and the investor demand was extremely strong.
Let's take a closer look at this strategy.
The Dump
By September, NAKA had already plummeted by 96%.
The PIPE investors who acquired shares early at $1.12 were finally able to cash out after the merger completion in August, and indeed, they did.
Bell's response was quite quirky for a public company CEO; he told those who were just here to play the stock market to hit the road.
So they did.
The stock price continued to fall. Dropped below $1. Dropped below 50 cents. Dropped below 30 cents. A company holding around 5,765 bitcoins (worth over $500 million) now had a market cap of less than $300 million.

The market's valuation of Nakamoto was even lower than the bitcoin value on its balance sheet, which is enough to illustrate how investors view the management team and company structure wrapped around those bitcoins.

Debt Spiral
As the stock price collapsed, Bell, like a gambler on the casino floor, kept switching loan providers.
The original capital structure included a $200 million convertible note from Yorkville Advisors, with a conversion price of $2.80. As NAKA's stock price plummeted below this price, the convertible note turned into debt that could potentially swallow equity. Therefore, on October 3, Nakamoto borrowed a $203 million term loan from Two Prime Lending to redeem Yorkville's note and interest.
Four days later, on October 7, they borrowed $206 million in USDT from Antalpha at 7% interest to repay Two Prime. Antalpha's loan had a term of only 30 days (with an option to extend for another 30 days). Within a week, they swapped a term loan for a convertible note, then swapped that for a 30-day bridge loan.
The plan was to convert this bridge loan into Antalpha's $250 million 5-year secured convertible note. The new convertible note was to pay off the bridge loan, the bridge loan to pay off the term loan, and the term loan to pay off the old convertible note.
But the $250 million convertible note never materialized on Antalpha's terms.
On December 16, Nakamoto borrowed $210 million USDT from Kraken at 8% interest, using its bitcoin treasury as 150% overcollateralization.

Let's do the math on this: The creditor holds $315 million worth of Bitcoin as collateral for a $210 million loan. If the NAKA stock price goes to zero, Kraken seizes the collateral. Even if Bitcoin drops by 33%, Kraken remains unscathed. At every stage of this drama, the creditor has been closely protected, while common stockholders have borne the brunt of a reflexive collapse.
Each new loan is a further tightening of the noose.
Countdown
On December 10, NASDAQ notified Nakamoto that due to the stock price being below $1 for 30 consecutive trading days, it faces delisting risk. The company must regain compliance by June 8, 2026, with the closing price above $1 for 10 consecutive trading days.
The current stock price is 29 cents.

Once delisted, Nakamoto will be unable to conduct ATM (at-the-market) offerings, issue convertible bonds, or use its stock as acquisition currency. Everything Beale assembled in this shell depends on a NASDAQ listing that is currently unsustainable.
Accounting Disaster
In November, Nakamoto filed an SEC Form 12b-25, acknowledging the inability to timely file quarterly reports due to accounting complexities from a merger. The preliminary data unveiled the truth:
The Nakamoto acquisition resulted in a $59.75 million loss (purchase price exceeding net asset value)
A $22.07 million unrealized loss on digital assets
A $1.41 million realized loss from selling Bitcoin
A $14.45 million debt repayment loss from a refinancing round
A quarterly loss of approximately $97 million, only partially offset by $21.8 million in accounting gains from contingencies. This company, meant to be a perfect Bitcoin reserve tool, can't even file its books on time.
Heist
This brings us back to this morning.
Nakamoto announces the signing of a final merger agreement to acquire BTC Inc and UTXO Management. BTC Inc owns Bitcoin Magazine and operates Bitcoin conferences. UTXO manages a Bitcoin-focused hedge fund.
Bailey is the Chairman and CEO of Buyer Nakamoto.
He is also the Founder of Seller BTC Inc and UTXO.
He is the Buyer, the Seller, and the CEO with approval rights.
But in the weeks leading up to the acquisition, he quietly transferred the CEO title to Brandon Greene, creating a thin veil between himself and the entity he was about to acquire with his shareholder equity.
This morning's transaction was fully financed through Nakamoto's stock, priced at 1.12 dollars per the embedded call option in the original marketing services agreement, while $NAKA is still struggling to crawl back to 0.29 dollars.
Valuation of Bailey's company's stock received is nearly four times the current market price. Securities holders of BTC Inc and UTXO will receive 3.636 billion shares, translating to a transaction value of 1.073 billion dollars at market prices.
However, these shares were issued at 1.12 dollars, meaning the deal was structured at the peak of the NAKA stock price surge, and the terms were never adjusted when the stock collapsed.
Forget about the fictional pricing in the contract. What really matters is that 3.636 billion new shares just entered the float. Regardless of whether it says 1.12 dollars or 0.29 dollars on the paperwork, existing shareholders have been diluted by this amount. The 1.12 dollar label is a nod to the Seller, but the dilution is real.
No additional shareholder approval was required as the call option was embedded in the initial merger documents, and shareholders had already voted on these documents back when NAKA was trading at 20 or 30 dollars.
The retail investors who approved these terms had no idea that they were authorizing a future locked-up acquisition of Bailey's private business at a substantial premium, while their own shares were going up in smoke.
Self-Dealing Transaction Architecture
Stepping back, the entire architecture is simply breathtaking.

Bailey created Nakamoto Holdings. Merged it into a publicly listed shell company via KindlyMD, raising 7.1 billion dollars. Fueled by retail enthusiasm, the stock price was pumped to 23 times NAV. PIPE investors entered at 1.12 dollars, while the public paid 20 to 30 times that figure. The stock price then plummeted by 99%.
During this time, the company went through three loan providers in a week, attempting to manage $200 million in debt, which was originally structured to convert to equity at a stock price much higher than the current level.
Now, as the stock price of this dumpster fire plummeted to below 30 cents, Bailey is leveraging this hollowed-out tool to, per terms agreed upon when the stock was trading at a hundredfold high, merge his private empire. The initial KindlyMD merger was a Trojan horse; the acquisition of BTC Inc was the actual payload.
Bailey had told us from the beginning. In the initial press release, he stated Nakamoto would acquire BTC Inc, subject to audit and the exercise of call options. The SPA was publicly filed, and the option terms disclosed. Everything was legally compliant and entirely transparent—just like with all opaque financial engineering, the truth lay buried in piles of unread documents.
This operator of Bitcoin Magazine, organizer of the largest Bitcoin conference, positioning himself as a leader in the Bitcoin movement, established a public company, destroyed 99% of shareholder value, and is now using it to premium-repurchase his enterprise.
He had likened himself to the Medicis. At least the Medicis created value for Florence before taking their cut.
Nakamoto is the freakshow that occurs when internet fame meets the public stock market.
Liquidity Event
David Bailey raised $710 million from over 200 investors across six continents. He promised them a future akin to Morgan, Medici, and Rothschild, a financial dynasty built on Bitcoin. He told them Nakamoto would bring Bitcoin to the heart of the global capital markets. He said their names would resonate in history.
But what he delivered was a 99% loss.
He priced the PIPE at $1.12 while retail bought in at $28. Without shareholders grasping the contents of the authorization, he embedded call options to acquire his own company in the documents. He cycled through three loan providers in a week to prevent $200 million in debt from crushing the equity, accumulating $14 million in debt payoff losses in the process. He sold Bitcoin from the treasury, intended to be held, at a loss. He couldn't even file quarterly reports on time. And when the stock finally hit 29 cents...
When the rubble was cleared, and the retail investors who trusted him were left with nothing, he exercised that call option, using the wreckage of investor capital to buy back his private empire at four times the market price.
Bellamy holds 11 million shares at a cost of $1.12. Adam Back holds nearly 9 million shares. Balaji, Lopp, Yusko, Salinas, and Wu Jihan, all entered at prices that a teacher, truck driver, or first-time investor will never see. These are the people shaping the Bitcoin narrative. They run conferences, publish magazines, manage funds, and tweet. They are the supply chain of belief, turning skeptics into believers and believers into bag holders.
Now, Bellamy owns Bitcoin Magazine, the Bitcoin conference, and a hedge fund, all tucked into a publicly traded company worth only a fraction of his Bitcoin holdings, all acquisitions done at four times market price worth of stock, all approved before a penny of retail money entered.
And he is not done.
Nakamoto has filed a $5 billion ATM (at-the-market) stock issuance with the SEC. Bellamy now controls the media division, conference division, hedge fund, and a shelf registration allowing him to continue issuing stock against the Bitcoin treasury until the last shred of value is squeezed out.
When exactly did the Bitcoin community hand the keys over to conference promoters and influencer capitalists? Why is anyone surprised when they drive away with the car?
You may also like

WEEX LALIGA Partnership 2026: Where Football Excellence Meets Crypto Innovation
WEEX becomes official crypto exchange partner of LALIGA in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Discover how this partnership brings together football excellence and trading discipline.

AI Apocalypse, a massive short squeeze

The "Second Truth" of the Luna Crash: Jane Street Exits Ahead of Plunge

Jane Street Market Manipulation, Stripe Considering Acquiring PayPal, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
WEEX × LALIGA 2026: Trade Crypto, Take Your Shot & Win Official LALIGA Prizes
Unlock shoot attempts through futures trading, spot trading, or referrals. Turn match predictions into structured rewards with BTC, USDT, position airdrops, and LALIGA merchandise on WEEX.

a16z: Why Do AI Agents Need a Stablecoin for B2B Payments?

February 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Web4.0, perhaps the most needed narrative for cryptocurrency

Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?

Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?

WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?

Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link

Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?

A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028

When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges

Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
WEEX LALIGA Partnership 2026: Where Football Excellence Meets Crypto Innovation
WEEX becomes official crypto exchange partner of LALIGA in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Discover how this partnership brings together football excellence and trading discipline.
AI Apocalypse, a massive short squeeze
The "Second Truth" of the Luna Crash: Jane Street Exits Ahead of Plunge
Jane Street Market Manipulation, Stripe Considering Acquiring PayPal, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
WEEX × LALIGA 2026: Trade Crypto, Take Your Shot & Win Official LALIGA Prizes
Unlock shoot attempts through futures trading, spot trading, or referrals. Turn match predictions into structured rewards with BTC, USDT, position airdrops, and LALIGA merchandise on WEEX.