On-Chain Data Academy (Part 3): Have the Whales Profiting from Bottom Feeding Cashed Out?
Original Article Title: "On-chain Data School (Part 3): Have the Bottom-Fishing Whales Taken Profit?"
Original Article Author: Mr. Berg, On-chain Data Analyst
This article is the 3rd part of the On-chain Data School series, with a total of 10 parts. It takes you step by step through understanding on-chain data analysis. Interested readers are welcome to follow this series of articles.
Related Reading: "On-chain Data School (Part 2): The Ever-profitable Hodlers, What Is Their BTC Acquisition Cost?"
TLDR
- This article will introduce the on-chain metric Realized Profit
- Realized Profit shows the daily amount of profit-taking in the market
- Massive Realized Profit is usually only caused by low-cost chip holders
- Tops are usually accompanied by massive Realized Profit
Realized Profit & Realized Loss Overview
Realized Profit, translated as "已实现利润" in Chinese, is based on the price of each BTC at the time of its last transfer and the price at the time of the previous transfer, calculating how many BTC are profitably settled each day. By summing up the total profit from these settled BTC, the daily Realized Profit can be obtained.
Of course, if the price at the time of the last transfer is lower than the price at the time of the previous transfer, it will be recorded as Realized Loss.

Realized Profit & Realized Loss Chart
Massive Realized Profit is Usually Only Caused by Low-Cost Chip Holders
As shown in the diagram below: Due to the high cost basis of holders, their profit margin is not large, so when they sell, the **Realized Profit** they can generate is not high.
Therefore, when we see a significant amount of Realized Profit, it usually means that holders with a low cost basis are selling BTC.

Realized Profit Calculation Diagram
Tops are usually accompanied by significant Realized Profit
When a large number of holders with a low cost basis sell their BTC, we will see clustered high-volume realized profits on the chart.
At this point, since the remaining participants in the market are high cost basis acquirers, and the market price is close to their cost basis, any slight shift in sentiment is more likely to trigger panic selling from them, causing a cascading price drop, forming a top.

Tops are usually accompanied by significant Realized Profit
Conclusion
The above is all the content of On-Chain Data School (III). For readers interested in delving deeper into on-chain data analysis, remember to keep track of this series of articles!
If you would like to see more analysis and educational content on on-chain data, feel free to follow my Twitter handle (X)!
I hope this article has been helpful to you. Thank you for reading.
You may also like

WLFI at it Again? Banking License Controversy Amid $500M Investment

The Aave civil war escalates, Morpho quietly doubles: Is the lending throne about to change hands?

Dune Stablecoin Research: The Flow and Demand of a $300 Billion Market

Stripe Annual Letter: New cognitive density is extremely high, especially the 5-level model of "AI + Payments"

Sam Altman's Twenty-Four Hours: The Pentagon said "no" twice, but only one was serious

The US-Iran Conflict Spreads to the Crypto Space: What to Expect in the Market on Monday

Lily Liu, the chair of the Solana Foundation, shouted "Don't waste time on crypto," is the crypto industry really dead?

The little deer live by the water and grass

The world belongs to Chinese people who speak English

Why Stop at 126K? Michael Saylor Breaks Down BTC Stagnation and Retail Absence Truth

Virtuals Protocol's inaugural Titan project: ROBO aims to give a wallet to a robot

Stablecoin Latest Report: Actual Distribution and Circulation Much More Notable Than Supply

Paradigm's New Arithmetic: When Crypto Can't Hold 12.7 Billion, AI Becomes the Answer

Wintermute Founder: In the Lost Cryptocurrency Market, What Can We Still Do?

$1.3 Billion Debt: BitDeer Faces Tough Battle

Anthropic's IPO Gamble: At the Most Unlikely Moment, It Chose to Say No

Paradigm's Math Problem: $12.7 Billion, Too Big for a Single Crypto Fund
